ShopinJA Classifieds

$ ShopinJA Electronics $ => Cellular Telephone Parts & Accessories => Topic started by: Khalil on October 05, 2017, 10:58:05 PM



Title: Lg G4 selling as parts 6k
Post by: Khalil on October 05, 2017, 10:58:05 PM
Has the bootloop issue but its clean 9/10, have 2 3000mAh batteries for it
 Call/Whatsapp 2865164 if youre interested


Title: Re: Lg G4 selling as parts 6k
Post by: tredoggg on November 28, 2017, 10:57:40 AM
i have same for sale call 3955142


Title: Re: Lg G4 selling as parts 6k
Post by: sigrie on January 07, 2018, 12:38:47 AM
is your price neg


Title: Re: Lg G4 selling as parts 6k
Post by: desmond462 on January 08, 2018, 07:25:39 PM
Has the bootloop issue but its clean 9/10, have 2 3000mAh batteries for it
 Call/Whatsapp 2865184 if youre interested


I think your phone number isn't correct, please check it.

I contact that number only to talk to a lady who said she don't know about wat am asking about.
i am interested in the phone .


Title: Re: Lg G4 selling as parts 6k
Post by: SL Electronics on January 19, 2018, 02:02:16 PM
BRAND NEW STARTER DEVICES AND PREMIUM DEVICES!!!!!!

Brand New - ZTE Maven 3 4G $14,000
Brand New - ZTE Blade Spark (fingerprint) $25,000

Brand New - LG Phoenix 3 4G $19,000
Brand New - LG Harmony $21,000
Brand New - LG Stylo 3 (Fingerprint) $30,000

Brand New - Samsung J3 Mission
$25,000
BrandNew - Samsung J3 Emerge $22,000
Brand New - Samsung Express prime 2 $27,000

Brand New - Kodak Ektra $30,000

Call/Text/WhatsApp: +18764239121

Message for price/discounts
Store Location: Central Plaza & Winchester business center.

[attachment deleted by admin]


Title: Re: Lg G4 selling as parts 6k
Post by: Khalil on April 13, 2018, 10:21:24 PM
Has the bootloop issue but its clean 9/10, have 2 3000mAh batteries for it
 Call/Whatsapp 2865184 if youre interested


I think your phone number isn't correct, please check it.

I contact that number only to talk to a lady who said she don't know about wat am asking about.
i am interested in the phone .
just seeing this my apologies it was indeed incorrect